This paper examines the impacts of subnational governance institutions on the development of private manufacturing fims in terms of new entry, fim size and labor productivity growth during 2006-2014 in Vietnam. Vietnam’s context during this period provides the best opportunities for examining the effcts of subnational institutions on the entry and growth of private fims, given vast diffrences in the institutional quality across provinces and the increasing contribution of the private sector to the national economy. The empirical results suggest that aspects of the provincial governance institutions diffr signifiantly in terms of their effcts on private fims’ entry and growth during the study period. The conventional approach of entry deregulation seems to not induce the entry and sustained growth of private fims, but more fundamental aspects of transparency, private property protection, and contract enforcement better serve the private sector development over longer time horizons. These fidings have important implications for the next stage of institutional reforms in a transitional economy such as that of Vietnam.
Tải ứng dụng đọc sách
Qr code NEU Book Reader
(Lưu ý: Sử dụng ứng dụng NEU Book Reader để xem đầy đủ tài liệu.
Bạn đọc có thể tải NEU Book Reader từ App Store hoặc Google play
với từ khóa "NEU Book Reader")
This paper examines the impacts of subnational governance institutions on the development of private manufacturing fims in terms of new entry, fim size and labor productivity growth during 2006-2014 in Vietnam. Vietnam’s context during this period provides the best opportunities for examining the effcts of subnational institutions on the entry and growth of private fims, given vast diffrences in the institutional quality across provinces and the increasing contribution of the private sector to the national economy. The empirical results suggest that aspects of the provincial governance institutions diffr signifiantly in terms of their effcts on private fims’ entry and growth during the study period. The conventional approach of entry deregulation seems to not induce the entry and sustained growth of private fims, but more fundamental aspects of transparency, private property protection, and contract enforcement better serve the private sector development over longer time horizons. These fidings have important implications for the next stage of institutional reforms in a transitional economy such as that of Vietnam.
