Trường DC | Giá trị | Ngôn ngữ |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Tu, Thuy Anh | |
dc.contributor.other | Le, Minh Ngoc | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-01T10:24:40Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-01T10:24:40Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 1868-0020 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dlib.neu.edu.vn/handle/NEU/58723 | - |
dc.description | international economy | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper makes use of two trade indicators, Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) and Regional Orientation (RO), to evaluate the economic impacts of the ASEAN Free Trade Area (The) and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) on Vietnamese commodities at the Harmonized System (HS) 2-digit level. Several sectors in which Vietnam has revealed a comparative advantage, has benefied from the AFTA, and would continue to enjoy trade creation from the RCEP, are: Cereals (10), Salt, sulphur, earth, stone, plaster, lime and cement (25), Rubber (40), Knitted or crocheted fabric (60), etc. More importantly, the result provides a list of commodities in which Vietnam has a comparative advantage and only experiences trade creation when participating in the RCEP. These are: Milling products, malt, starches, inulin, wheat gluten (11), Vegetable plaiting materials, vegetable products not elsewhere specifid (14), Wood and articles of wood, wood charcoal (44), etc. Findings also show commodities in which Vietnam has a comparative advantage; but are not well positioned in the RCEP market yet, e.g. Cereal, flur, starch, milk preparations and products (19) and Manmade staple fires (55). If suffient investment decisions and marketing strategies are applied to these commodities, they will well penetrate the RCEP market and bring trade creation and welfare improvement to Vietnam. Public and private investment should consider the above-mentioned commodities as targets to leapfrog the benefis of RCEP. | |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 1. Introduction; 2. FTA proliferation in East Asia; 3. Theoretical impacts of an FTA; 4. FTA impact assessment by trade indicators; 5. Impacts of AFTA and RCEP on Vietnam at sectoral level; 6. Policy implications and conclusion remarks; | |
dc.format.extent | Khổ 21 x 29.7 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Kinh Tế Quốc Dân | |
dc.subject | Regional trade agreement | |
dc.subject | ASEAN | |
dc.subject | RCEP | |
dc.subject | impact assessment | |
dc.subject | trade indicators. | |
dc.title | Trade Creation or Trade Diversion in ASEAN and ASEAN+6 FTAs: Trade Indicators Approach | |
dc.type | Journal of Economics and Development | |
dc.identifier.barcode | Article 2_JED_Vol 17_Number 3 | |
dc.relation.reference | B. Balassa (1965), Trade Liberalisation and Revealed Comparative Advantage, The Manchester School. Fukunari Kimura (2010), ‘Economic integration in extended East Asia: toward a new trade regime’, In: Noel Gaston and Ahmed M. Khalid (eds), Globalization and Economic Integration: Winners and Losers in the Asia-Pacifi, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. Erlinda M. Medalla (2011), Taking Stock of the ROOs in the ASEAN+1 FTAs: Toward Deepening East Asia Integration, paper prepared for ERIA project “Comprehensive Mapping of FTAs in ASEAN and East Asia.” M. Mikic and J. Gilbert (2007), Trade Statistics In Policymaking—A Handbook OfCommonly Used Trade Indices And Indicators, Studies in Trade and Investment, Trade Policy Section, Trade and Investment Division, UNESCAP. | |
Bộ sưu tập | 02. Tạp chí (Tiếng Anh) |
Tải ứng dụng đọc sách
Qr code NEU Book Reader
(Lưu ý: Sử dụng ứng dụng NEU Book Reader để xem đầy đủ tài liệu.
Bạn đọc có thể tải NEU Book Reader từ App Store hoặc Google play
với từ khóa "NEU Book Reader")
Trường DC | Giá trị | Ngôn ngữ |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Tu, Thuy Anh | |
dc.contributor.other | Le, Minh Ngoc | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-01T10:24:40Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-01T10:24:40Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 1868-0020 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dlib.neu.edu.vn/handle/NEU/58723 | - |
dc.description | international economy | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper makes use of two trade indicators, Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) and Regional Orientation (RO), to evaluate the economic impacts of the ASEAN Free Trade Area (The) and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) on Vietnamese commodities at the Harmonized System (HS) 2-digit level. Several sectors in which Vietnam has revealed a comparative advantage, has benefied from the AFTA, and would continue to enjoy trade creation from the RCEP, are: Cereals (10), Salt, sulphur, earth, stone, plaster, lime and cement (25), Rubber (40), Knitted or crocheted fabric (60), etc. More importantly, the result provides a list of commodities in which Vietnam has a comparative advantage and only experiences trade creation when participating in the RCEP. These are: Milling products, malt, starches, inulin, wheat gluten (11), Vegetable plaiting materials, vegetable products not elsewhere specifid (14), Wood and articles of wood, wood charcoal (44), etc. Findings also show commodities in which Vietnam has a comparative advantage; but are not well positioned in the RCEP market yet, e.g. Cereal, flur, starch, milk preparations and products (19) and Manmade staple fires (55). If suffient investment decisions and marketing strategies are applied to these commodities, they will well penetrate the RCEP market and bring trade creation and welfare improvement to Vietnam. Public and private investment should consider the above-mentioned commodities as targets to leapfrog the benefis of RCEP. | |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 1. Introduction; 2. FTA proliferation in East Asia; 3. Theoretical impacts of an FTA; 4. FTA impact assessment by trade indicators; 5. Impacts of AFTA and RCEP on Vietnam at sectoral level; 6. Policy implications and conclusion remarks; | |
dc.format.extent | Khổ 21 x 29.7 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Kinh Tế Quốc Dân | |
dc.subject | Regional trade agreement | |
dc.subject | ASEAN | |
dc.subject | RCEP | |
dc.subject | impact assessment | |
dc.subject | trade indicators. | |
dc.title | Trade Creation or Trade Diversion in ASEAN and ASEAN+6 FTAs: Trade Indicators Approach | |
dc.type | Journal of Economics and Development | |
dc.identifier.barcode | Article 2_JED_Vol 17_Number 3 | |
dc.relation.reference | B. Balassa (1965), Trade Liberalisation and Revealed Comparative Advantage, The Manchester School. Fukunari Kimura (2010), ‘Economic integration in extended East Asia: toward a new trade regime’, In: Noel Gaston and Ahmed M. Khalid (eds), Globalization and Economic Integration: Winners and Losers in the Asia-Pacifi, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. Erlinda M. Medalla (2011), Taking Stock of the ROOs in the ASEAN+1 FTAs: Toward Deepening East Asia Integration, paper prepared for ERIA project “Comprehensive Mapping of FTAs in ASEAN and East Asia.” M. Mikic and J. Gilbert (2007), Trade Statistics In Policymaking—A Handbook OfCommonly Used Trade Indices And Indicators, Studies in Trade and Investment, Trade Policy Section, Trade and Investment Division, UNESCAP. | |
Bộ sưu tập | 02. Tạp chí (Tiếng Anh) |