| Trường DC | Giá trị | Ngôn ngữ |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | P. C. Parida | |
| dc.contributor.other | Arup Mitra | |
| dc.contributor.other | Kailash Ch. Pradhan | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-01T10:24:11Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-01T10:24:11Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 1997-0020 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dlib.neu.edu.vn/handle/NEU/58685 | - |
| dc.description | Economic | |
| dc.description.abstract | Purpose – This study attempts to examine the missing middle (MM) phenomena in the context of the Indian manufacturing sector using the unit level information from the database of Ministry of Corporate Affair, Government of India. Design/methodology/approach – Unlike the previous studies, the present study first bifurcated the missing enterprises into two categories such as “ permanently” dropped and “ reappeared,” in order to pursue a meaningful analysis and derive conclusions with policy insights. Various financial indicators were used to explain the causes of MM phenomena during 2009–2010 and 2016–2017, in a logistic framework. Findings – The study found that profit margin ratio is higher for the group of medium sized enterprises which continued in comparison to the units which dropped out permanently. Similar is the case with the ratio of investment turnover. The econometric results, however suggest that the relationship between the chances of a firm being dropped out and financial indicators is weak as the coefficients of various financial indicators are found to be statistically significant only for a few years. Originality/value – The study suggests that the missing middle phenomenon is not a myth in India as very large number of medium-sized firms have been disappearing from the market over the years. Based on firm level data it identifies the factors which resulted in such a phenomenon. | |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 1. Introduction; 2. Review of literature; 3. Methodology and data source; 4. The missing middle: trends at the aggregate and disaggregate levels; 5. The missing middle: plausible determinants; 6. The missing middle: econometric analysis; 7. Conclusions | |
| dc.format.extent | Khổ 21 x 29.7 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Kinh Tế Quốc Dân | |
| dc.subject | Missing middle | |
| dc.subject | Manufacturing sector | |
| dc.subject | India | |
| dc.title | The missing middle phenomenon in Indian manufacturing sector: myths or realities? | |
| dc.type | Journal of Economics and Development | |
| dc.identifier.barcode | 10-1108_JED-09-2020-0120 | |
| dc.relation.reference | Bagchi, A., Kavita Rao, R. and Sen, B. (2010), “Tax breaks for the small-scale sector: an appraisal”, Tax Research Unit Working Paper 3. Bhat, T.P. (2013), “Growth and structural changes in Indian industry”, Working Paper No. 2013/02, Institute for Studies in Industrial Development (ISID), New Delhi. Bhavani, T.A. (2002), “Small scale units in the era of globalization: problems and prospects”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 37 No. 29, pp. 3041-3052. Bhide, S. (2000), “Development of SSI: a collaborative approach”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 9, pp. 4389-4390. Charles, R. and Frank (1968), “Urban unemployment and economic growth in Africa”, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 250-274. Das, D.K. (2004), “Manufacturing productivity under varying trade regimes, 1980–2000”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 39, pp. 423-433 Desai, V. (1979), Organization and Management of Small-Scale Industries, Himalayan Publishing House, Bombay, pp. 536-34. Dhar, P.N. and Lydall, H.F. (1961), The Role of Small Enterprises in Indian Economic Development, Asia Publishing House, Bombay. Goldar, B. (2004), “Productivity trends in Indian manufacturing in the pre-and post-reforms period”, ICRIER Working Paper, No. 137, pp. 1-34. Goldar, B. (2006), “Productivity growth in Indian manufacturing in the 1980s and 1990s”, in Tendulkar, S.D., Mitra, A., Narayanan, K. and Das, D.K. (Eds), India: Industrialization Ina Reforming Economy, Academic Publishers, New Delhi. Goldar, B. and Kumari, A. (2003), “Import liberalization and productivity growth in Indian manufacturing industries in the 1990s”, The Developing Economies, Vol. 41, pp. 436-60. Hasan, R. and Jandoc, K.R.L. (2010), “The distribution of firm size in India: what can survey data tell us?”, ADB Economics Working Paper Series, No. 213, August, ADB. Hsieh, C. and Olken, B.A. (2014), “The missing missing middle”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 89-108. Krueger, A.O. (2009), “The missing middle”, ICRIER Working Paper, No. 230, pp. 1-32. Krueger, A.O. (2013), “The missing middle”, in Nicholas, C., Anjini Kochar, H., Roger, N. and Srinivasan, T.N. (Eds), Economic Reform in India: Challenges, Prospects, and Lessons, Cambridge University Press. Levy, S. (2008), Good Intentions, Bad Outcomes: Social Policy, Informality, and Economic Growth in Mexico, Brookings Institution, Washington, District of Columbia. Liedholm, C. and Mead, D.C. (1987), “Small scale industries in developing countries: empirical evidence and policy implications”, Technical Report, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University. Little, I., Dipak, M. and John, P. (1987), “Small manufacturing enterprises: a comperative analysis of India and other economies”, Technical Report 10118, A World Bank Research Publication. Mazumdar, D. and Sarkar, S. (2009), “The employment problem in India and the phonenon of missing middle”, Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 43-56. Mazumdar, D. and Sarkar, S. (2013), Manufacturing Enterprise in Asia: Size Structure and Economic Growth, Routledge and IDRC, London and New York. Mohanty, N. (2014), “Manufacturing strategy in a changing context”, ISID Working Paper, No. 176, ISID. Poojary, M.C. (1996), “Small-scale sector; myth and reality”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 31 No. 21, pp. M11-M14. Ramaswamy, K.V. (2013), “Understanding the ‘missing middle’ in Indian manufacturing: the role of size-dependent labour regulations and fiscal incentives”, V.R.F. Series, No. 480, pp. 1-43. Ramu, S.S. (1985), Entrepreneurship and Enterprise Growth, Seema Publication, Delhi. Rana, D. (2001), “Employment generation in small units – a case study”, Yojana, pp. 41-44, 55. Ray, S.C. (2002), “Did India’s economic reforms improve efficiency and productivity? A non-parametric analysis of the initial evidence from manufacturing”, Indian Economic Review, Vol. 37, pp. 23-57. Rudra, K.K. (1977), “Employment potential and capacity utilisation”, Yojan, Vol. XXI No. 19, p. 32. Srivastav, V. and Sengupta, A. (2000), “Endogeneity of the solow residual: some evidence from Indian data”, National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER) Discussion Paper, No. 13. Steel, W.F. and Webster, L.M. (1992), “How small enterprises in Ghana have responded to adjustment”, The World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 6, pp. 423-438.Trivedi, P., Prakash, A. and Sinate, D. (2000), “ Productivity in major manufacturing industries in India: 1973–74 to 1997–98” , Development Research Group Study, No. 20, Department of Economic Analysis and Policy, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai. Tybout, J.R. (2000), “ Manufacturing firms in developing countries: how well do they and why?” , Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 38, pp. 11-44. Tybout, J. (2014), The Missing Middle, Revisited, Pennsylvania State University and NBER | |
Bộ sưu tập | 02. Tạp chí (Tiếng Anh) | |
Tải ứng dụng đọc sách
Qr code NEU Book Reader
(Lưu ý: Sử dụng ứng dụng NEU Book Reader để xem đầy đủ tài liệu.
Bạn đọc có thể tải NEU Book Reader từ App Store hoặc Google play
với từ khóa "NEU Book Reader")
| Trường DC | Giá trị | Ngôn ngữ |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | P. C. Parida | |
| dc.contributor.other | Arup Mitra | |
| dc.contributor.other | Kailash Ch. Pradhan | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-01T10:24:11Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-01T10:24:11Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 1997-0020 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dlib.neu.edu.vn/handle/NEU/58685 | - |
| dc.description | Economic | |
| dc.description.abstract | Purpose – This study attempts to examine the missing middle (MM) phenomena in the context of the Indian manufacturing sector using the unit level information from the database of Ministry of Corporate Affair, Government of India. Design/methodology/approach – Unlike the previous studies, the present study first bifurcated the missing enterprises into two categories such as “ permanently” dropped and “ reappeared,” in order to pursue a meaningful analysis and derive conclusions with policy insights. Various financial indicators were used to explain the causes of MM phenomena during 2009–2010 and 2016–2017, in a logistic framework. Findings – The study found that profit margin ratio is higher for the group of medium sized enterprises which continued in comparison to the units which dropped out permanently. Similar is the case with the ratio of investment turnover. The econometric results, however suggest that the relationship between the chances of a firm being dropped out and financial indicators is weak as the coefficients of various financial indicators are found to be statistically significant only for a few years. Originality/value – The study suggests that the missing middle phenomenon is not a myth in India as very large number of medium-sized firms have been disappearing from the market over the years. Based on firm level data it identifies the factors which resulted in such a phenomenon. | |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 1. Introduction; 2. Review of literature; 3. Methodology and data source; 4. The missing middle: trends at the aggregate and disaggregate levels; 5. The missing middle: plausible determinants; 6. The missing middle: econometric analysis; 7. Conclusions | |
| dc.format.extent | Khổ 21 x 29.7 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Kinh Tế Quốc Dân | |
| dc.subject | Missing middle | |
| dc.subject | Manufacturing sector | |
| dc.subject | India | |
| dc.title | The missing middle phenomenon in Indian manufacturing sector: myths or realities? | |
| dc.type | Journal of Economics and Development | |
| dc.identifier.barcode | 10-1108_JED-09-2020-0120 | |
| dc.relation.reference | Bagchi, A., Kavita Rao, R. and Sen, B. (2010), “Tax breaks for the small-scale sector: an appraisal”, Tax Research Unit Working Paper 3. Bhat, T.P. (2013), “Growth and structural changes in Indian industry”, Working Paper No. 2013/02, Institute for Studies in Industrial Development (ISID), New Delhi. Bhavani, T.A. (2002), “Small scale units in the era of globalization: problems and prospects”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 37 No. 29, pp. 3041-3052. Bhide, S. (2000), “Development of SSI: a collaborative approach”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 9, pp. 4389-4390. Charles, R. and Frank (1968), “Urban unemployment and economic growth in Africa”, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 250-274. Das, D.K. (2004), “Manufacturing productivity under varying trade regimes, 1980–2000”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 39, pp. 423-433 Desai, V. (1979), Organization and Management of Small-Scale Industries, Himalayan Publishing House, Bombay, pp. 536-34. Dhar, P.N. and Lydall, H.F. (1961), The Role of Small Enterprises in Indian Economic Development, Asia Publishing House, Bombay. Goldar, B. (2004), “Productivity trends in Indian manufacturing in the pre-and post-reforms period”, ICRIER Working Paper, No. 137, pp. 1-34. Goldar, B. (2006), “Productivity growth in Indian manufacturing in the 1980s and 1990s”, in Tendulkar, S.D., Mitra, A., Narayanan, K. and Das, D.K. (Eds), India: Industrialization Ina Reforming Economy, Academic Publishers, New Delhi. Goldar, B. and Kumari, A. (2003), “Import liberalization and productivity growth in Indian manufacturing industries in the 1990s”, The Developing Economies, Vol. 41, pp. 436-60. Hasan, R. and Jandoc, K.R.L. (2010), “The distribution of firm size in India: what can survey data tell us?”, ADB Economics Working Paper Series, No. 213, August, ADB. Hsieh, C. and Olken, B.A. (2014), “The missing missing middle”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 89-108. Krueger, A.O. (2009), “The missing middle”, ICRIER Working Paper, No. 230, pp. 1-32. Krueger, A.O. (2013), “The missing middle”, in Nicholas, C., Anjini Kochar, H., Roger, N. and Srinivasan, T.N. (Eds), Economic Reform in India: Challenges, Prospects, and Lessons, Cambridge University Press. Levy, S. (2008), Good Intentions, Bad Outcomes: Social Policy, Informality, and Economic Growth in Mexico, Brookings Institution, Washington, District of Columbia. Liedholm, C. and Mead, D.C. (1987), “Small scale industries in developing countries: empirical evidence and policy implications”, Technical Report, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University. Little, I., Dipak, M. and John, P. (1987), “Small manufacturing enterprises: a comperative analysis of India and other economies”, Technical Report 10118, A World Bank Research Publication. Mazumdar, D. and Sarkar, S. (2009), “The employment problem in India and the phonenon of missing middle”, Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 43-56. Mazumdar, D. and Sarkar, S. (2013), Manufacturing Enterprise in Asia: Size Structure and Economic Growth, Routledge and IDRC, London and New York. Mohanty, N. (2014), “Manufacturing strategy in a changing context”, ISID Working Paper, No. 176, ISID. Poojary, M.C. (1996), “Small-scale sector; myth and reality”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 31 No. 21, pp. M11-M14. Ramaswamy, K.V. (2013), “Understanding the ‘missing middle’ in Indian manufacturing: the role of size-dependent labour regulations and fiscal incentives”, V.R.F. Series, No. 480, pp. 1-43. Ramu, S.S. (1985), Entrepreneurship and Enterprise Growth, Seema Publication, Delhi. Rana, D. (2001), “Employment generation in small units – a case study”, Yojana, pp. 41-44, 55. Ray, S.C. (2002), “Did India’s economic reforms improve efficiency and productivity? A non-parametric analysis of the initial evidence from manufacturing”, Indian Economic Review, Vol. 37, pp. 23-57. Rudra, K.K. (1977), “Employment potential and capacity utilisation”, Yojan, Vol. XXI No. 19, p. 32. Srivastav, V. and Sengupta, A. (2000), “Endogeneity of the solow residual: some evidence from Indian data”, National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER) Discussion Paper, No. 13. Steel, W.F. and Webster, L.M. (1992), “How small enterprises in Ghana have responded to adjustment”, The World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 6, pp. 423-438.Trivedi, P., Prakash, A. and Sinate, D. (2000), “ Productivity in major manufacturing industries in India: 1973–74 to 1997–98” , Development Research Group Study, No. 20, Department of Economic Analysis and Policy, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai. Tybout, J.R. (2000), “ Manufacturing firms in developing countries: how well do they and why?” , Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 38, pp. 11-44. Tybout, J. (2014), The Missing Middle, Revisited, Pennsylvania State University and NBER | |
Bộ sưu tập | 02. Tạp chí (Tiếng Anh) | |
