This paper uses the Propensity Score Matching method (PSM) to determine the criteria of eligibility for production and income subsidies and the Diffrence-in-Diffrence method (DID) to evaluate the impact of these policies on households’ economic well-being in Vietnam. The empirical results indicate that though these policies have not contributed to a clear economic well-being improvement of the participating households, their impacts tend to move in a positive direction. It should be noted that though these policies do not make the income/expenditure of the participating households increase, they help increase the income component from agricultural production signifiantly, especially for the group receiving production subsidies, and at the same time increase spending on durable goods and health care services in comparison with nonparticipating households.
Tải ứng dụng đọc sách
Qr code NEU Book Reader
(Lưu ý: Sử dụng ứng dụng NEU Book Reader để xem đầy đủ tài liệu.
Bạn đọc có thể tải NEU Book Reader từ App Store hoặc Google play
với từ khóa "NEU Book Reader")
This paper uses the Propensity Score Matching method (PSM) to determine the criteria of eligibility for production and income subsidies and the Diffrence-in-Diffrence method (DID) to evaluate the impact of these policies on households’ economic well-being in Vietnam. The empirical results indicate that though these policies have not contributed to a clear economic well-being improvement of the participating households, their impacts tend to move in a positive direction. It should be noted that though these policies do not make the income/expenditure of the participating households increase, they help increase the income component from agricultural production signifiantly, especially for the group receiving production subsidies, and at the same time increase spending on durable goods and health care services in comparison with nonparticipating households.
